Joe Tacopina US Attorney Judge Loretta Preska Big Pussy Soprano Style Protect Informant Lawyer Joe Tacopina? In what can only be described as a Big Pussy moment where life is imitating art in my opinion -- hardee har har -- oh yeah this is an opinion blog --- Joe Tacopina who did not understand The First Amendment and that suing the NYDN was not only futile but shockingly stupid -- was very quietly forced to drop his lawsuit against the 2 NYDN sports reporters -- my YouTube parody the best.
I am just an artist but it appears to me that Judge Preska is not interested in Justice but in protecting Feds and an informant lawyer is clearly guilty and this is unfolding like an episode out of The Sopranos. Joe Tacopina won't end up like big pussy but Tacopina belongs in jail.
My blog also satirical.
Well we call Joe Tacopina the informant liar oops the informant lawyer . A sucker is born every minute so Joe can still suffer an idiot in to hiring him --- but does he call the suckers a client or his next potential victim? Hardee har har....
Just like Eric Garner murdered by the NYPD for the alleged crime of selling a cig for 50 cents earlier in the day --- the law is very strange and seems to protect NYPD that murder and the a lawyer like Joe Tacopina the informant lawyer.
From the NYDN:
Bernie Kerik lost a legal battle on Wednesday, but not the weapons to continue the fight.
FYI: The NYDN Blocks MY Comments Preventing me from having First Amendment Right and Now is trying to Force People to Fill out a Form Before Reading an Article so I copied and pasted it:
A judge denied a request by Kerik to release documents that detail his former attorney’s conversations with prosecutors before the former New York police commissioner was indicted in 2007 on fraud and tax-evasion charges, but she left open the possibility Kerik and his attorney could obtain the records through civil-litigation discovery.
“This doesn’t stop us from getting the documents in the civil case, or from deposing Mr. Tacopina about his cooperation with prosecutors,” said Kerik’s attorney, Tim Parlatore.
The order by U.S. District Court Chief Judge Loretta Preska seemed to support Kerik’s central allegation in his bloody legal battle with brash celebrity lawyer Joe Tacopina: Kerik claims that Tacopina, his former lawyer and business partner, revealed privileged information with federal prosecutors that later led to the ex-top cop’s felony indictment.
“The Tacopina documents contain details about the government’s criminal investigations, including information about cooperating witnesses,” Preska wrote. “Disclosure of these documents might reveal investigatory tactics and might also discourage potential cooperators in ongoing or future government investigations.”
Kerik had asked Preska to lift the protective order on records describing five secret proffer sessions in which Tacopina allegedly met with federal prosecutors before the 2007 indictment that led to Kerik’s three-year prison sentence. Prosecutors Perry Carbone and Elliott Jacobson requested a hearing with Preska to determine if Kerik had violated the protective order by describing the proffer sessions in an amended complaint alleging legal malpractice the ex-commissioner filed against his estranged friend earlier this year.
Preska ordered the prosecutors to huddle with Kerik and Parlatore, as well as with Tacopina and his lawyer Judd Burstein, and report to her about how they want to proceed on the hearing by Friday, Aug. 1.
Burstein told the Daily News earlier this year that his client would welcome the release of the files in the Kerik case. But when details about Tacopina’s meetings with prosecutors surfaced in Kerik’s court filings, Burstein called for a criminal probe of Kerik and Parlatore.
Tacopina and Lanny Davis, the Washington insider who represented Tacopina when he represented Alex Rodriguez’s legal team during the Yankee star’s disastrous effort to avoid a year-long steroid ban, have repeatedly said that no proffer sessions took place.
Kerik has sued Tacopina for racketeering, fraud and malpractice — claims that Tacopina denies. Tacopina has sued Kerik for defamation, and is also fighting a complaint Kerik lodged in December with the disciplinary committee of the New York State bar.
LINKS TO THIS POST
Create a Link